With the exception of pre-Statehood water rights (Territorial Appropriations), you must obtain a permit from the State Engineer PRIOR TO commencement of construction of any project proposing to appropriate water for a beneficial use.
It depends. For a stock reservoir (in-place use), the current land owner may claim ownership of the reservoir using an Affidavit (sworn statement). The water stored in an irrigation reservoir (Primary Permit) WITH a Secondary Permit is controlled by the owner of the points of use identified in the Secondary Permit. For a reservoir WITHOUT a Secondary Permit, we consider the reservoir owner to be that shown by the records in our office. Any reservoir may be assigned to a new owner by executing an Assignment of Permit OR by inclusion of the reservoir (by name and Permit Number) in the Warranty Deed or Certificate of Ownership that transfers ownership of a piece of property.
A direct flow water right attaches to the point of use and there is no need to "put it in your name". Many times, a piece of irrigated property may be split into numerous ownerships and the BOC would not consider putting a single owner onto a Certificate with many "owners".
Not without the permission of the owner. The issuance of a permit DOES NOT constitute the granting of a right-of-way.
No. An application DOES NOT equal a permit.
No, he doesn't. The priority date of a permit is established when the application is RECEIVED AND FILED FOR RECORD, regardless of how long it takes to issue the permit.
Under Wyoming Water Law, water stored in an irrigation reservoir may be used anywhere in the State. There is a good chance that the seller is irrigating the property in preparation of selling it but will probably discontinue irrigation once the sale is final. Buyer beware!
Not necessarily. Unless your lands are covered by a water right carried by the ditch, you have no claim to the water or the ditch.
No. "One who destroys a private irrigating ditch is liable for the difference in the value of the land belonging to the owner without the ditch and with it." Sutherland on Damages (4th ed. Vol. 4, pg. 3760).
The ditch owner has the right to maintain his ditch and this includes a "reasonable" distance on each side of the ditch to run equipment. Unless you agree to maintain the ditch on your property, any structures could be destroyed by his ditch-cleaning equipment.
No. A 1965 Wyoming Attorney General addressed this question in quoting from Weil in "Water Rights in the Western States" when he said: "As in the case of any easement, the ditch owner as the dominant, has the duty of keeping the ditch in repair, and not the landowner. Correspondingly, he has the right of entry upon the servient estate to make repairs and to clean out the ditches, and if the landowner interferes, injunction lies.
Not necessarily. Wyoming does not recognize riparian rights. Wyoming is a Prior Appropriation Doctrine state and a permit is required in order to divert water. There is a provision in the law that provides for the use of water for instream stock use.
Not necessarily. Our jurisdiction ends at the headgate and does not extend down the ditch. We may be asked to help mediate a dispute but the final say may be a civil matter.
A co-owner of a ditch should never undertake maintenance expenses without first consulting the other owners of the ditch. Unless it can be shown that all co-owners will benefit from the improvement, it may be difficult to recover the full cost.
This one is a little tricky. As for trespassing on BLM property, this is a Right-of-Way issue and not our fight. As for the water right issue, the key is the date that the change was made. Prior to 1965, there was no statute requiring that a change in point of diversion be recorded with the State Engineer or Board of Control. If the amended water right were to call for priority regulation, the Superintendent may choose to not honor the call until the record is corrected to reflect the on-the-ground situation or the headgate is moved back to the location of record.
Adjudication of a water right is simply a determination by the Board of Control that water has been and is being beneficially applied to the land to the extent and by the means set in the permit. It finalizes the priority date, point of diversion location, the area(s) or point(s) of use, use(s) and rate (cfs or gpm). Once a water right is adjudicated, a Certificate of Appropriation or Construction (reservoirs only) is issued and filed in the county clerk’s office where the appropriation is located.
The Board of Control is responsible for the adjudication process for each permit. The Adjudication procedure involves a field inspection to assure that the water is being put to a beneficial use as specified under the permit.
The requirements for submission of, advertising, holding open for inspection, opportunity of contest, and allowance of proofs of appropriation of water are set out in W.S. 41-4-511, and the other statutes mentioned therein. Hearings and contests of proofs, hearing fees, and dispositions after hearing are governed by W.S. 41-4-311 through W.S. 41-4-314 and Chapter IV, Adjudication of Proofs, Section 1 of the Regulations and Instructions (Part IV) of the State Board of Control.
When the final notice of completion of beneficial use of water or completion of construction of a reservoir is filed by the water user, a proof will be forwarded by the Adjudication Officer to the superintendent of the water division in which the project is located. A letter is sent to the water user advising him of the necessary action for submission of final proof. A water user may also contact the superintendent to arrange a time and place when final proof will be taken (see W.S. 41-4-511). Also, See Chapter IV, Adjudication of Proofs, Section 1 of the Regulations and Instructions (Part IV) of the State Board of Control for more information.